Vitamin D and risk of cause specific death: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort and randomised intervention studies.
View / Open Files
Authors
Kunutsor, Setor
Vitezova, Anna
Chowdhury, Susmita
Kiefte-de-Jong, Jessica C
Khan, Hassan
Baena, Cristina P
Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
Hoshen, Moshe B
Feldman, Becca S
Pan, An
Johnson, Laura
Crowe, Francesca
Hu, Frank B
Franco, Oscar H
Publication Date
2014-04-01Journal Title
BMJ
ISSN
0959-535X
Publisher
BMJ
Volume
348
Pages
g1903
Language
eng
Type
Article
Physical Medium
Electronic
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Chowdhury, R., Kunutsor, S., Vitezova, A., Oliver-Williams, C., Chowdhury, S., Kiefte-de-Jong, J. C., Khan, H., et al. (2014). Vitamin D and risk of cause specific death: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort and randomised intervention studies.. BMJ, 348 g1903. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1903
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the extent to which circulating biomarker and supplements of vitamin D are associated with mortality from cardiovascular, cancer, or other conditions, under various circumstances. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and reference lists of relevant studies to August 2013; correspondance with investigators. STUDY SELECTION: Observational cohort studies and randomised controlled trials in adults, which reported associations between vitamin D (measured as circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration or vitamin D supplement given singly) and cause specific mortality outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted by two independent investigators, and a consensus was reached with involvement of a third. Study specific relative risks from 73 cohort studies (849,412 participants) and 22 randomised controlled trials (vitamin D given alone versus placebo or no treatment; 30,716 participants) were meta-analysed using random effects models and were grouped by study and population characteristics. RESULTS: In the primary prevention observational studies, comparing bottom versus top thirds of baseline circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D distribution, pooled relative risks were 1.35 (95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.61) for death from cardiovascular disease, 1.14 (1.01 to 1.29) for death from cancer, 1.30 (1.07 to 1.59) for non-vascular, non-cancer death, and 1.35 (1.22 to 1.49) for all cause mortality. Subgroup analyses in the observational studies indicated that risk of mortality was significantly higher in studies with lower baseline use of vitamin D supplements. In randomised controlled trials, relative risks for all cause mortality were 0.89 (0.80 to 0.99) for vitamin D3 supplementation and 1.04 (0.97 to 1.11) for vitamin D2 supplementation. The effects observed for vitamin D3 supplementation remained unchanged when grouped by various characteristics. However, for vitamin D2 supplementation, increased risks of mortality were observed in studies with lower intervention doses and shorter average intervention periods. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from observational studies indicates inverse associations of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D with risks of death due to cardiovascular disease, cancer, and other causes. Supplementation with vitamin D3 significantly reduces overall mortality among older adults; however, before any widespread supplementation, further investigations will be required to establish the optimal dose and duration and whether vitamin D3 and D2 have different effects on mortality risk.
Keywords
Cause of Death, Dietary Supplements, Humans, Risk Factors, Vitamin D, Vitamin D Deficiency, Vitamins
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1903
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/286181
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Licence URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk