How imperfect can land sparing be before land sharing is more favourable for wild species?
Journal of Applied Ecology
MetadataShow full item record
Balmford, B., Green, R., Onial, M., Phalan, B., & Balmford, A. (2019). How imperfect can land sparing be before land sharing is more favourable for wild species?. Journal of Applied Ecology, 56 (1), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13282
Two solutions, at opposite ends of a continuum, have been proposed to limit negative impacts of human agricultural demand on biodiversity. Under land sharing, farmed landscapes are made as beneficial to wild species as possible, usually at the cost of lower yields. Under land sparing, yields are maximized and land not needed for farming is spared for nature. Multiple empirical studies have concluded land-sparing strategies would be least bad for wild species provided land not needed for agriculture was indeed spared for nature, but the possibility of imperfections in the delivery of land sparing has not been comprehensively considered.
agricultural demand, biodiversity, density-yield curve, habitat restoration, imperfect land sparing, land sharing, land sparing, wildlife-friendly farming
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13282
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/286323
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: email@example.com