Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBalmford, B
dc.contributor.authorGreen, RE
dc.contributor.authorOnial, M
dc.contributor.authorPhalan, B
dc.contributor.authorBalmford, A
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-05T00:31:07Z
dc.date.available2018-12-05T00:31:07Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0021-8901
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/286323
dc.description.abstractTwo solutions, at opposite ends of a continuum, have been proposed to limit negative impacts of human agricultural demand on biodiversity. Under land sharing, farmed landscapes are made as beneficial to wild species as possible, usually at the cost of lower yields. Under land sparing, yields are maximized and land not needed for farming is spared for nature. Multiple empirical studies have concluded land-sparing strategies would be least bad for wild species provided land not needed for agriculture was indeed spared for nature, but the possibility of imperfections in the delivery of land sparing has not been comprehensively considered.
dc.publisherWiley
dc.titleHow imperfect can land sparing be before land sharing is more favourable for wild species?
dc.typeArticle
prism.endingPage84
prism.issueIdentifier1
prism.publicationDate2019
prism.publicationNameJournal of Applied Ecology
prism.startingPage73
prism.volume56
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.33633
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-09-28
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/1365-2664.13282
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-01-01
dc.contributor.orcidBalmford, B [0000-0002-4102-5250]
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2664
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
cam.issuedOnline2018-10-23
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate2019-01-01


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record