Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYoung, Alison L
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T00:30:20Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T00:30:20Z
dc.date.issued2018-07
dc.identifier.issn0008-1973
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/286599
dc.description.abstractBlack, a prisoner at HMP Wymott, was concerned that passive smoking was damaging his health. He requested that the NHS Smoke-Free Compliance Line (SFCL) be installed in prisons, enabling him to report breaches of the smoking ban found in Part 1 of the Health Act 2006. He followed up his request with a pre-action protocol for judicial review, which initially resulted in the prison issuing instructions to allow Black access to the SFCL. However, Black’s victory was short-lived. The Secretary of State replied to the pre-action protocol letter that Part 1 of the Health Act 2006 did not bind the Crown. Therefore the SFCL had no statutory role to play in the enforcement of the smoking ban in State prisons. Black then brought an action for judicial review against the Secretary of State’s letter. This raised an important constitutional issue - how far does legislation bind the Crown?
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
dc.titleTHE PRESUMPTION THAT LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS DO NOT BIND THE CROWN: PROPOSED MODIFICATION GOES UP IN SMOKE
dc.typeArticle
prism.endingPage240
prism.issueIdentifier2
prism.publicationDate2018
prism.publicationNameCAMBRIDGE LAW JOURNAL
prism.startingPage237
prism.volume77
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.33911
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-04-30
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1017/S0008197318000430
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-07
dc.contributor.orcidYoung, Alison L [0000-0002-9881-965X]
dc.identifier.eissn1469-2139
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
cam.issuedOnline2018-07-06
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate2019-07-31


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record