Intensive care admission criteria for traumatic brain injury patients across Europe.
View / Open Files
Authors
Volovici, Victor
Citerio, Giuseppe
Stocchetti, Nino
Haitsma, Iain K
Huijben, Jilske A
Dirven, Clemens MF
van der Jagt, Mathieu
Steyerberg, Ewout W
Nelson, David
Cnossen, Maryse C
Maas, Andrew IR
Polinder, Suzanne
Menon, David K
Lingsma, Hester F
Publication Date
2019-02Journal Title
J Crit Care
ISSN
0883-9441
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
49
Pages
158-161
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Physical Medium
Print-Electronic
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Volovici, V., Ercole, A., Citerio, G., Stocchetti, N., Haitsma, I. K., Huijben, J. A., Dirven, C. M., et al. (2019). Intensive care admission criteria for traumatic brain injury patients across Europe.. J Crit Care, 49 158-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.11.002
Abstract
Within a prospective, observational, multi-center cohort study 68 hospitals (of which 66 responded), mostly academic (n = 60, 91%) level I trauma centers (n = 44, 67%) in 20 countries were asked to complete questionnaires regarding the "standard of care" for severe neurotrauma patients in their hospitals. From the questionnaire pertaining to ICU management, 12 questions related to admission criteria were selected for this analysis. The questionnaires were completed by 66 centers. The median number of TBI patients admitted to the ICU was 92 [interquartile range (IQR): 52-160] annually. Admission policy varied; in 45 (68%) centers, patients with a Glasgow Come Score (GCS) between 13 and 15 without CT abnormalities but with other risk factors would be admitted to the ICU while the rest indicated that they would not admit these patients routinely to the ICU. We found no association between ICU admission policy and the presence of a dedicated neuro ICU, the discipline in charge of rounds, the presence of step down beds or geographic location (North- Western Europe vs. South - Eastern Europe and Israel). Variation in admission policy, primarily of mild TBI patients to ICU exists, even among high-volume academic centers and seems to be largely independent of other center characteristics. The observed variation suggests a role for comparative effectiveness research to investigate the potential benefit and cost-effectiveness of a liberal versus more restrictive admission policies.
Keywords
CENTER-TBI, Cost-effectiveness, European policy, Intensive care admission, Intensive care occupancy, Moderate and Severe TBI, Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Cohort Studies, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Critical Care, Europe, Hospitalization, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Israel, Patient Admission, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Trauma Centers
Sponsorship
EU FP7 grant
Funder references
European Commission (602150)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.11.002
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/286769
Rights
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk