A tool to evaluate design performance in SMEs
View / Open Files
Authors
Moultrie, J
Clarkson, PJ
Probert, DR
Publication Date
2006Journal Title
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
ISSN
1741-0401
Publisher
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd
Volume
55
Issue
3/4
Pages
184-216
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P., & Probert, D. (2006). A tool to evaluate design performance in SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55 (3/4), 184-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400610653192
Abstract
<jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>The creation of well‐designed products is widely acknowledged as an important contributor to company success. In principle, an effective design process, as part of the wider new product development (NPD) process, should result in well‐designed products. This paper aims to present a tool to enable a design team to evaluate their design process in a workshop setting, with a view to targeting improvements.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p>This tool is based on literature and has been iteratively developed using a mixed research approach, including detailed exploratory cases and application in action research mode.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>The resulting tool comprises two main components. A “process audit” based on process maturity principles, which targets the design‐related activities in NPD. The process audit enables a company team to identify improvement opportunities in the design process. A product audit enables perceptions towards product characteristics to be assessed. The audit tool does not seek to be a benchmarking tool, but aims to capture “good design” principles in a form which is accessible and useful to practitioners.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Practical implications</jats:title><jats:p>In use, the tool enabled managers to balance their concern with meeting budget and timescale demands against the importance of producing well‐designed products. By first focusing on the tangible output of the design process – the product – practitioners are better able to understand the way in which design decisions influence product usability, desirability and producibility. Evidence from cases confirms the value and originality of this tool.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>Previous tools addressing product development have focused on strategic and managerial concerns. This novel assessment tool focuses explicitly on design issues, within the wider context of NPD.</jats:p></jats:sec>
Sponsorship
EPSRC (GR/R64100/01)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400610653192
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/286817
Rights
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk