A systems biology approach uncovers the core gene regulatory network governing iridophore fate choice from the neural crest.
View / Open Files
Authors
Petratou, Kleio
Subkhankulova, Tatiana
Schwetlick, Hartmut
Publication Date
2018-10Journal Title
PLoS Genet
ISSN
1553-7390
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Volume
14
Issue
10
Pages
e1007402
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Physical Medium
Electronic-eCollection
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Petratou, K., Subkhankulova, T., Lister, J. A., Rocco, A., Schwetlick, H., & Kelsh, R. N. (2018). A systems biology approach uncovers the core gene regulatory network governing iridophore fate choice from the neural crest.. PLoS Genet, 14 (10), e1007402. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007402
Abstract
Multipotent neural crest (NC) progenitors generate an astonishing array of derivatives, including neuronal, skeletal components and pigment cells (chromatophores), but the molecular mechanisms allowing balanced selection of each fate remain unknown. In zebrafish, melanocytes, iridophores and xanthophores, the three chromatophore lineages, are thought to share progenitors and so lend themselves to investigating the complex gene regulatory networks (GRNs) underlying fate segregation of NC progenitors. Although the core GRN governing melanocyte specification has been previously established, those guiding iridophore and xanthophore development remain elusive. Here we focus on the iridophore GRN, where mutant phenotypes identify the transcription factors Sox10, Tfec and Mitfa and the receptor tyrosine kinase, Ltk, as key players. Here we present expression data, as well as loss and gain of function results, guiding the derivation of an initial iridophore specification GRN. Moreover, we use an iterative process of mathematical modelling, supplemented with a Monte Carlo screening algorithm suited to the qualitative nature of the experimental data, to allow for rigorous predictive exploration of the GRN dynamics. Predictions were experimentally evaluated and testable hypotheses were derived to construct an improved version of the GRN, which we showed produced outputs consistent with experimentally observed gene expression dynamics. Our study reveals multiple important regulatory features, notably a sox10-dependent positive feedback loop between tfec and ltk driving iridophore specification; the molecular basis of sox10 maintenance throughout iridophore development; and the cooperation between sox10 and tfec in driving expression of pnp4a, a key differentiation gene. We also assess a candidate repressor of mitfa, a melanocyte-specific target of sox10. Surprisingly, our data challenge the reported role of Foxd3, an established mitfa repressor, in iridophore regulation. Our study builds upon our previous systems biology approach, by incorporating physiologically-relevant parameter values and rigorous evaluation of parameter values within a qualitative data framework, to establish for the first time the core GRN guiding specification of the iridophore lineage.
Keywords
Animals, Animals, Genetically Modified, Cell Lineage, Chromatophores, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Gene Regulatory Networks, Mutation, Neural Crest, SOXE Transcription Factors, Stem Cells, Systems Biology, Zebrafish, Zebrafish Proteins
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007402
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/286933
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk