What we talk about when we talk about (big) data
View / Open Files
Authors
Jones, MR
Publication Date
2019-03Journal Title
Journal of Strategic Information Systems
ISSN
0963-8687
Publisher
Elsevier
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
3-16
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Jones, M. (2019). What we talk about when we talk about (big) data. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28 (1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.10.005
Abstract
In common with much contemporary discourse around big data, recent discussion of datafication in the Journal of Strategic Information Systems has focused on its effects on individuals, organisations and society. Generally missing from such analysis, however, is any consideration of data themselves. What is it that is having these effects? In this Viewpoint article I therefore present a critical analysis of a number of widely-held assumptions about data in general and big data in particular. Rather than being a referential, natural, foundational, objective and equal representation of the world, it will be argued, data are partial and contingent and are brought into being through situated practices of conceptualization, recording and use. Big data are also not as revolutionary voluminous, universal or exhaustive as they are often presented. Some initial implications of this reconceptualization of data are explored. A distinction is made between “data in principle” as they are recorded, and the “data in practice” as they are used. It is only the latter, typically a small and not necessarily representative subset of the former, that will contribute directly to the effects of datafication.
Sponsorship
Health Foundation
Funder references
Health Foundation (7381)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.10.005
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/287203
Rights
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk