Admissible multiarm stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial designs.
View / Open Files
Publication Date
2019-03-30Journal Title
Stat Med
ISSN
0277-6715
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
1103-1119
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Physical Medium
Print-Electronic
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Grayling, M. J., Mander, A. P., & Wason, J. M. (2019). Admissible multiarm stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial designs.. Stat Med, 38 (7), 1103-1119. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8022
Abstract
Numerous publications have now addressed the principles of designing, analyzing, and reporting the results of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials. In contrast, there is little research available pertaining to the design and analysis of multiarm stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials, utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of multiple experimental interventions. In this paper, we address this by explaining how the required sample size in these multiarm trials can be ascertained when data are to be analyzed using a linear mixed model. We then go on to describe how the design of such trials can be optimized to balance between minimizing the cost of the trial and minimizing some function of the covariance matrix of the treatment effect estimates. Using a recently commenced trial that will evaluate the effectiveness of sensor monitoring in an occupational therapy rehabilitation program for older persons after hip fracture as an example, we demonstrate that our designs could reduce the number of observations required for a fixed power level by up to 58%. Consequently, when logistical constraints permit the utilization of any one of a range of possible multiarm stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial designs, researchers should consider employing our approach to optimize their trials efficiency.
Keywords
admissible design, cluster randomized trial, multiple comparisons, optimal design, stepped-wedge, Cluster Analysis, Computer Simulation, Hip Fractures, Humans, Linear Models, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Research Design, Sample Size
Sponsorship
MRC (unknown)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8022
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/287231
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk