Epistemic trust and the ethics of science communication: against transparency, openness, sincerity and honesty
Accepted version
Peer-reviewed
Repository URI
Repository DOI
Change log
Authors
John, Stephen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1062-0188
Abstract
It is commonly claimed that scientists should hold certain communicative virtues, such as sincerity, openness, honesty and transparency. This paper uses the case of climate science to argue against these claims. Rather, based on a novel account of the range of ways in which non-experts learn from experts (detailed in Section 1), there are reasons to deny that scientists are under any basic obligation to be sincere, honest, open or transparent. Furthermore, not only are these claims analytically confused, they are epistemologically and politically dangerous. Sections 2-4 argue for these claims. The conclusion proposes an alternative standard for ethical communication: that scientists should not engage in “wishful speaking”.
Description
Keywords
5003 Philosophy, 50 Philosophy and Religious Studies, 5002 History and Philosophy Of Specific Fields, 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Journal Title
Social Epistemology
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
0269-1728
1464-5297
1464-5297
Volume Title
32
Publisher
Informa UK Limited