Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes.
View / Open Files
Publication Date
2018Journal Title
PLoS One
ISSN
1932-6203
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
e0207709
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Physical Medium
Electronic-eCollection
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Hilton, B., Tempest-Mitchell, J., Davies, B., & Kotter, M. (2018). Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes.. PLoS One, 13 (12), e0207709. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207709
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [DCM] often presents with non-specific symptoms and signs. It progresses insidiously and leads to permanent neurological dysfunction. Decompressive surgery can halt disease progression, however significant delays in diagnosis result in increased disability and limit recovery. The nature of early DCM symptoms is unknown, moreover it has been suggested incomplete examination contributes to missed diagnosis. This study examines how DCM is currently assessed, if assessment differs between stages of healthcare, and whether this influences patient management. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Cervical MRI scans (N = 1123) at a tertiary neurosciences center, over a single year, were screened for patients with DCM (N = 43). Signs, symptoms, and disease severity of DCM were extracted from patient records. Patients were considered at 3 phases of clinical assessment: primary care, secondary care, and surgical assessment. RESULTS: Upper limb paraesthesia and urinary dysfunction were consistently the most and least prevalent symptoms respectively. Differences between assessing clinicians were present in the reporting of: limb pain (p<0.005), objective limb weakness (p = 0.01), hyperreflexia (p<0.005), Hoffmann reflex (p<0.005), extensor plantar reflex (p = 0.007), and lower limb spasticity (p<0.005). Pathological reflexes were least frequently assessed by primary care doctors. CONCLUSION: DCM assessment varies significantly between assessors. Reporting of key features of DCM is especially low in primary care. Incomplete assessment may hinder early diagnosis and referral to spinal surgery.
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cervical Vertebrae, Cohort Studies, Delayed Diagnosis, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Neurosurgery, Specialization, Spinal Cord Compression, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult
Sponsorship
Department of Health (via National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)) (CS-2015-15-023)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207709
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/287481
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk