The 'Kaiserchronik' and its three recensions
View / Open Files
Publication Date
2019Journal Title
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DEUTSCHES ALTERTUM UND DEUTSCHE LITERATUR
ISSN
0044-2518
Publisher
Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Volume
148
Issue
2
Pages
141-208
Language
en
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Chinca, M., Hunter, H., & Young, C. (2019). The 'Kaiserchronik' and its three recensions. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DEUTSCHES ALTERTUM UND DEUTSCHE LITERATUR, 148 (2), 141-208. https://doi.org/10.3813/ZFDA-2019-0006
Abstract
The ‘Kaiserchronik’, whose first recension was compiled around the middle of the twelfth century, is the most widely transmitted and recopied work of early Middle High German literature. A text of the verse chronicle, either complete or as excerpts, is transmitted in fifty manuscripts and manuscript fragments that are still extant or known to have existed; their dates span the period from the late twelfth to the late sixteenth century, and their geographical provenance covers the entire German-speaking world, from the Upper German heartlands of the transmission through Central Germany and even (in the case of the text interpolated in manuscripts of the ‘Sächsische Weltchronik’) the Low German territories of the North. Of these fifty witnesses, twenty-seven transmit the chronicle in one or other of its two thirteenth-century verse recensions: B (ca. 1200; fifteen witnesses) and C (ca. 1250; twelve witnesses); one further manuscript contains a mixed text of A and C. These recensions make considerable changes to the old text: they recast its early MHG prosody, characterized by half-rhymes, assonances and freely rhythmicized lines of verse of up to seven or eight beats, into the new poetic norm of four-beat rhyming couplets; they abbreviate the text, and also (in the case of C) replace its prologue with a new one and extend its narrative into what for the redactor and his public was the recent past. Yet although the status of Recensions B and C as independent retextualizations is fully recognized by scholarship, a detailed and accurate appreciation of their particular tendencies and defining qualities has been impeded by the lack of an edition; researchers have been obliged to rely instead on the accounts provided by the chronicle’s nineteenth-century editors, who were more interested in the reconstruction of the original, mid-twelfth century text than they were in its thirteenth-century recensions.
Sponsorship
Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/J006513/1)
Embargo Lift Date
2100-01-01
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.3813/ZFDA-2019-0006
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/287868
Rights
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk