The European Commission’s proposal for a cross-border mechanism (ECBM): Potential implications and perspectives
View / Open Files
Authors
Sielker, F
Publication Date
2018-10-08Journal Title
Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law
ISSN
2514-9407
Publisher
Emerald
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
219-239
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Sielker, F. (2018). The European Commission’s proposal for a cross-border mechanism (ECBM): Potential implications and perspectives. Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law, 10 (3), 219-239. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPPEL-08-2018-0024
Abstract
The European Commission proposed a regulation for a mechanism to resolve legal and administrative obstacles in cross-border regions as part of the legislative package for EU Cohesion Policy 2021-2027. The mechanism is known as ECBM, or European Cross-border Mechanism. The regulation will allow one Member State to apply their legal provision in another Member State for a concretely defined case. This proposal is particularly interesting as it does not give further competence to the European level, but changes how Member States may interact with one another, yet, it raises critiques as regards to its compliance with constitutional, international and European law. This paper outlines the main elements of contention, which are legal justification, state sovereignty, compliance with the subsidiarity and proportionality principle, thematic and territorial scope, voluntariness and the administrative burden. The paper concludes that the assessment of the voluntariness of the regulation will be crucial in examining the regulations compliance with EU principles, and suggest that a more nuanced reading as to which parts of the regulation are voluntary is needed. The legal text will likely change substantially during the legislative procedure, in particular in regard to the thematical scope and the bindingness. This piece summarises the debate currently held in the European Council and the European Parliament in a structured way to an interested readership. Examining the proposed regulation and the arguments for and against it offers the opportunity to review the main arguments that will be raised in any future debate on legal proposals on territorial development initiatives
Keywords
16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Sponsorship
British Academy Newton International Fellowship
Funder" NF161284
RG 84766
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPPEL-08-2018-0024
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/287957
Rights
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk