Probability Distortion Depends on Choice Sequence in Rhesus Monkeys.
View / Open Files
Publication Date
2019-04-10Journal Title
J Neurosci
ISSN
0270-6474
Publisher
Society for Neuroscience
Volume
39
Issue
15
Pages
2915-2929
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Physical Medium
Print-Electronic
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Ferrari-Toniolo, S., Bujold, P. M., & Schultz, W. (2019). Probability Distortion Depends on Choice Sequence in Rhesus Monkeys.. J Neurosci, 39 (15), 2915-2929. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1454-18.2018
Abstract
Humans and other primates share many decision biases, among them our subjective distortion of objective probabilities. When making choices between uncertain rewards we typically treat probabilities nonlinearly: overvaluing low probabilities of reward and undervaluing high ones. A growing body of evidence, however, points to a more flexible pattern of distortion than the classical inverse-S one, highlighting the effect of experimental conditions in shifting the weight assigned to probabilities, such as task feedback, learning, and attention. Here we investigated the role of sequence structure (the order in which gambles are presented in a choice task) in shaping the probability distortion patterns of rhesus macaques: we presented 2 male monkeys with binary choice sequences of MIXED or REPEATED gambles against safe rewards. Parametric modeling revealed that choices in each sequence type were guided by significantly different patterns of probability distortion: whereas we elicited the classical inverse-S-shaped probability distortion in pseudorandomly MIXED trial sequences of gamble-safe choices, we found the opposite pattern consisting of S-shaped distortion, with REPEATED sequences. We extended these results to binary choices between two gambles, without a safe option, and confirmed the unique influence of the sequence structure in which the animals make choices. Finally, we showed that the value of gambles experienced in the past had a significant impact on the subjective value of future ones, shaping probability distortion on a trial-by-trial basis. Together, our results suggest that differences in choice sequence are sufficient to reverse the direction of probability distortion.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Our lives are peppered with uncertain, probabilistic choices. Recent studies showed how such probabilities are subjectively distorted. In the present study, we show that probability distortions in macaque monkeys differ significantly between sequences in which single gambles are repeated (S-shaped distortion), as opposed to being pseudorandomly intermixed with other gambles (inverse-S-shaped distortion). Our findings challenge the idea of fixed probability distortions resulting from inflexible computations, and points to a more instantaneous evaluation of probabilistic information. Past trial outcomes appeared to drive the "gap" between probability distortions in different conditions. Our data suggest that, as in most adaptive systems, probability values are slowly but constantly updated from prior experience, driving measures of probability distortion to either side of the S/inverse-S debate.
Keywords
choice, decision making, primates, reward, risk, utility, Animals, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Gambling, Macaca mulatta, Male, Photic Stimulation, Probability, Reinforcement Schedule, Reward, Risk-Taking
Sponsorship
Funding sources: Wellcome Grants: WT 095495, WT 204811; ERC Advanced Grant: 293549
Funder references
Wellcome Trust (095495/Z/11/Z)
European Research Council (293549)
Wellcome Trust (204811/Z/16/Z)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1454-18.2018
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/288092
Rights
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk