Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHemming, Karla
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, Kelly
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorForbes, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorTaljaard, Monica
dc.contributor.authorReview Group, Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Trial
dc.contributor.authorPilling, Mark
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-18T00:31:31Z
dc.date.available2019-01-18T00:31:31Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-18
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/288181
dc.description.abstractThe Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extension for the stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (SW-CRT) is a recently published reporting guideline for SW-CRTs. We assess the quality of reporting of a recent sample of SW-CRTs according to the 26 items in the new guideline using a novel crowd sourcing methodology conducted independently and in duplicate, with random assignment, by 50 reviewers. We assessed reliability of the quality assessments, proposing this as a novel way to assess robustness of items in reporting guidelines. Several items were well reported. Some items were very poorly reported, including several items that have unique requirements for the SW-CRT, such as the rationale for use of the design, description of the design, identification and recruitment of participants within clusters, and concealment of cluster allocation (not reported in more than 50% of the reports). Agreement across items was moderate (median percentage agreement was 76% [IQR 64 to 86]). Agreement was low for several items including the description of the trial design and why trial ended or stopped for example. When reporting SW-CRTs authors should pay particular attention to ensure clear reporting on the exact format of the design with justification, as well as how clusters and individuals were identified for inclusion in the study, and whether this was done before or after randomisation of the clusters, which are crucial for risk of bias assessments. Some items, including why the trial ended might either not be relevant to SW-CRTs, or might be unclearly described in the statement.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was partly funded by the UK NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West Midlands initiative. Karla Hemming is funded by a NIHR Senior Research Fellowship SRF-2017-10-002. Jennifer Thompson is funded by the Medical Research Council UK.
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleThe CONSORT extension for Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomised Trials: baseline assessment of reporting quality -and assessment of inter-rater reliability using a crowd-sourcing systematic review
dc.typeArticle
prism.publicationDate2019
prism.publicationNameJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.35497
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-11-19
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s13063-018-3116-3
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-01-18
dc.contributor.orcidPilling, Mark [0000-0002-7446-6597]
dc.identifier.eissn1745-6215
dc.publisher.urlhttps://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-018-3116-3#article-info
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
cam.issuedOnline2019-01-18
dc.identifier.urlhttps://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-018-3116-3#article-info
cam.orpheus.successMon Jul 20 07:55:40 BST 2020 - The item has an open VoR version.
cam.orpheus.counter12
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate2100-01-01


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International