Accurate autocorrelation modeling substantially improves fMRI reliability.
Accepted version
Peer-reviewed
Repository URI
Repository DOI
Change log
Authors
Abstract
Given the recent controversies in some neuroimaging statistical methods, we compare the most frequently used functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) analysis packages: AFNI, FSL and SPM, with regard to temporal autocorrelation modeling. This process, sometimes known as pre-whitening, is conducted in virtually all task fMRI studies. Here, we employ eleven datasets containing 980 scans corresponding to different fMRI protocols and subject populations. We found that autocorrelation modeling in AFNI, although imperfect, performed much better than the autocorrelation modeling of FSL and SPM. The presence of residual autocorrelated noise in FSL and SPM leads to heavily confounded first level results, particularly for low-frequency experimental designs. SPM's alternative pre-whitening method, FAST, performed better than SPM's default. The reliability of task fMRI studies could be improved with more accurate autocorrelation modeling. We recommend that fMRI analysis packages provide diagnostic plots to make users aware of any pre-whitening problems.
Description
Keywords
Journal Title
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
2041-1723
Volume Title
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Sponsorship
Medical Research Council (MR/M009041/1)
Medical Research Council (MR/M024873/1)