in addressing the question of whether human prefrontal cortex (PFC) is “disproportionately larger in humans compared with nonhuman primates” in their article in PNAS, Donahue et al. (1) gloss over the distinction between proportional and relative size. Agreeing with previous work (2⇓–4), they show that PFC occupies a larger proportion of the cerebral cortex in humans than in chimpanzees and a larger proportion in chimpanzees than in macaques. Contrary to their presentation of the debate, this fact is uncontroversial. However, proportional size is often a misleading functional metric because of nonlinear, or allometric, scaling: A biological structure can differ across species as a proportion of overall size and yet be functionally equivalent (5) (Fig. 1). PFC volume proportion is predictable from overall brain size, even among nonhuman species (2⇓–4). This increase in volume proportions may be a scaling effect, with no consequences for functional influence exerted by PFC if there are different scaling constraints on different cortical regions (6). For example, disproportionate PFC white matter volume and cell size increases may be necessary to maintain long-range neural connectivity and neural transmission speed in larger brains and bodies (4, 6, 7). Indeed, this is consistent with Donahue et al.’s observation that white matter largely explains the species differences they observe in PFC proportional volume.