Mapping novel psychoactive substances policy in the EU: The case of Portugal, the Netherlands, Czech Republic, Poland, the United Kingdom and Sweden.
Authors
Steenhuizen, Marthe
Czabanowska, Katarzyna
Publication Date
2019-01Journal Title
PloS one
ISSN
1932-6203
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
e0218011
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Physical Medium
Electronic-eCollection
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Neicun, J., Steenhuizen, M., van Kessel, R., Yang, J., Negri, A., Czabanowska, K., Corazza, O., & et al. (2019). Mapping novel psychoactive substances policy in the EU: The case of Portugal, the Netherlands, Czech Republic, Poland, the United Kingdom and Sweden.. PloS one, 14 (6), e0218011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218011
Abstract
Introduction: The rapid rise in trade and use of NPS and the lack of information concerning their potential toxicity pose serious challenges to public health authorities across the world. Policy measures towards NPS taken so far have a special focus on their legal status, while the implementation of a public health strategy seems to be still missing. The aim of this study is to perform a general assessment of NPS-related policy (including regulatory measures and public health strategies) implemented by six European countries: Portugal, the Netherlands, Czech Republic, Poland, the United Kingdom and Sweden.
Methods: Six EU countries were included in this scoping review study. Drug policies (including legal responses and public health strategies) were analysed. UNODC drug policy classification system was used as a benchmark, while path dependency approach was used for data analysis; a net of inter-dependencies between international, EU and national policies was highlighted.
Results and discussion: The countries included in this study can be placed in a wide spectrum according to their formulation of drug policy, from Portugal and the UK that have specific legal responses to NPS but have differently focused on harm reduction strategies at one end, to Sweden whose drug-free society goal is not translated into a specific regulation of NPS at the other end.
Conclusion: The findings of the study reveal limited development towards harmonisation of national drug policies– particularly with regard to NPS. To tackle the challenge presented by NPS, EU Member states have formulated legislation and public health strategies independently. National approaches to NPS are therefore in line with their already existing drug policies, reflecting cultural values towards substance abuse and national political interests, while the homogenization at an international level has so far mostly been focused on law enforcement and drugs use preventive strategies.
Keywords
Humans, Psychotropic Drugs, European Union, Health Policy
Sponsorship
Dr Andres Roman-Urrestarazu’s work received funding from the Gillings Fellowship in Global Public Health, Grant Award YOG054.
Funder references
Gillings Family Foundation ()
Embargo Lift Date
2022-06-03
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218011
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/293343
Rights
All rights reserved