Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Martinen
dc.contributor.authorRoland, Martinen
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T12:41:21Z
dc.date.available2019-07-10T12:41:21Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-17en
dc.identifier.issn0959-8146
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/294517
dc.description.abstractIt’s time to rethink one of the most ambitious experiments in general practice To describe the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF)—one of the most ambitious pay-for-performance schemes introduced into any health system—as divisive would be an understatement. Launched in the UK in 2004 as a way of encouraging adherence to specified evidence based elements of general practice care, QOF has changed the nature of general practice in ways that have polarised those who work in the sector and external commentators.1
dc.format.mediumElectronicen
dc.languageengen
dc.publisherBMJ
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectForecastingen
dc.subjectHealth Policyen
dc.subjectReimbursement, Incentiveen
dc.subjectQuality Assurance, Health Careen
dc.subjectEnglanden
dc.subjectOutcome and Process Assessment, Health Careen
dc.titleThe future of the Quality and Outcomes Framework in England.en
dc.typeArticle
prism.publicationDate2017en
prism.publicationNameBMJ (Clinical research ed.)en
prism.startingPagej4681
prism.volume359en
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.18064
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-10-09en
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/bmj.j4681en
rioxxterms.versionAM*
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-10-17en
dc.contributor.orcidRoland, Martin [0000-0002-8533-3060]
dc.identifier.eissn1756-1833
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record