Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKlatte, Tobiasen
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Granten
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-06T23:31:18Z
dc.date.available2019-09-06T23:31:18Z
dc.date.issued2019-12en
dc.identifier.issn2305-5839
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/296539
dc.description.abstractThe incidence of renal tumours has been increasing over the last decades because of more frequent abdominal imaging, leading to higher numbers of renal tumours identified at an early stage (1). Guidelines emphasise surgery as a preferred treatment modality for patients with clinical T1 N0 M0 tumours, but consider thermal ablation and active surveillance as an alternative approach for T1a lesions (2,3). High-quality studies comparing partial nephrectomy (PN) and thermal ablation are sparse, and the majority of studies are limited by small numbers, short follow-up and their retrospective design.
dc.format.mediumPrinten
dc.languageengen
dc.publisherAME Publishing Company
dc.rightsAll rights reserved
dc.rights.uri
dc.titlePartial nephrectomy versus thermal ablation for clinical T1 renal tumours.en
dc.typeArticle
prism.issueIdentifierSuppl 8en
prism.publicationDate2019en
prism.publicationNameAnnals of translational medicineen
prism.startingPageS363
prism.volume7en
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.43586
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-08-30en
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.21037/atm.2019.09.12en
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-12en
dc.contributor.orcidStewart, Grant [0000-0003-3188-9140]
dc.identifier.eissn2305-5847
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
cam.orpheus.success2021-01-06 ''Changed embargo length to indefinite embargo. Added exception 'publisher disallows deposit''
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate2100-01-01


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record