The Association between Supraphysiologic Arterial Oxygen Levels and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study.
View / Open Files
Authors
Klapaukh, Roman
Marra, Giampiero
MacCallum, Niall S
Jones, Andrew
Beale, Richard
Rashan, Aasiyah
Singer, Mervyn
Publication Date
2019-12Journal Title
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
ISSN
1073-449X
Publisher
American Thoracic Society
Volume
200
Issue
11
Pages
1373-1380
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Physical Medium
Print
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Palmer, E., Post, B., Klapaukh, R., Marra, G., MacCallum, N. S., Brealey, D., Ercole, A., et al. (2019). The Association between Supraphysiologic Arterial Oxygen Levels and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study.. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 200 (11), 1373-1380. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201904-0849OC
Abstract
Rationale
There is conflicting evidence on harm related to exposure to supra-physiologic arterial oxygen tensions (hyperoxemia) in critically ill patients.
Objectives
To examine the association between longitudinal exposure to hyperoxemia and mortality in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in 5 UK University Hospitals.
Methods
Retrospective cohort of ICU admissions between 31st January 2014 - 31st December 2018, from the National Institute of Health Research Critical Care Health Informatics Collaborative (CC-HIC). Multivariable logistic regression modelled death in ICU by exposure to hyperoxemia.
Measurements
Subsets with oxygen exposure windows of 0-1, 0-3, 0-5 and 0-7 days were evaluated, capturing 19,515, 10,525, 6,360 and 4,296 patients, respectively.
Hyperoxemia dose was defined as the area between the PaO2 time curve and a boundary of 13.3 kPa (100 mmHg) divided by the hours of potential exposure (24, 72, 120, or 168 hours).
For Review Only
Main Results
An association was found between exposure to hyperoxemia and ICU mortality [odds ratios (95% compatibility intervals); 1.15 (0.95-1.38), p = 0.15; 1.35 (1.04-1.74), p = 0.02; 1.5 (1.07-2.13), p = 0.02; and 1.74 (1.11-2.72), p = 0.02 for exposure windows of 0-1, 0-3, 0-5 and 0-7 days’ duration, respectively. However, a dose-response relationship was not observed. There was no evidence to support a differential effect between hyperoxemia and either a respiratory diagnosis or mechanical ventilation.
Conclusions
An association between hyperoxemia and mortality was observed in our large, unselected multicenter cohort. The absence of a dose-response relationship weakens causal interpretation. Further experimental research is warranted to elucidate this important question.
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201904-0849OC
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/296847
Rights
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved