Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Arifen
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-09T00:30:35Z
dc.date.available2019-11-09T00:30:35Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-01en
dc.identifier.issn0031-8116
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/298771
dc.description.abstractAbstract. A standard argument for one-boxing in Newcomb’s Problem is ‘Why Ain’cha Rich?’, which emphasizes that one-boxers typically make a million dollars compared to the thousand dollars that two-boxers can expect. A standard reply is the ‘opportunity defence’: the two-boxers who made a thousand never had an opportunity to make more. The paper argues that the opportunity defence is unavailable to anyone who grants that in another case – a Frankfurt case – the agent is deprived of opportunities in the way that advocates of Frankfurt cases typically claim.
dc.description.sponsorshipLeverhulme Trust
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.rightsAll rights reserved
dc.rights.uri
dc.titleFrankfurt cases and the Newcomb Problemen
dc.typeArticle
prism.endingPage3408
prism.issueIdentifier11en
prism.publicationDate2020en
prism.publicationNamePhilosophical Studiesen
prism.startingPage3391
prism.volume177en
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.45827
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-06en
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s11098-019-01375-0en
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-11-01en
dc.contributor.orcidAhmed, Arif [0000-0001-7826-3335]
dc.identifier.eissn1573-0883
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
pubs.funder-project-idLeverhulme Trust (RF-2018-231\10)
cam.orpheus.successThu Jan 30 10:35:59 GMT 2020 - Embargo updated*
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate2020-01-01


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record