Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSINGH, RAMANDEEPen
dc.contributor.authorAlexandrova, Annaen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-12T00:32:29Z
dc.date.available2019-12-12T00:32:29Z
dc.date.issued2020-07en
dc.identifier.issn2398-063X
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/299784
dc.description.abstractHappiness economics as advocated by Frijters et al makes three assumptions: that policy should be based on facts about the net effect of a factor on happiness, that well-being policy should be technocratic and centralised, and that the only credible objections come from critics who do not value happiness. We argue that all three should be rejected and that the science and policy of well-being should instead be pluralistic, context-sensitive, and participatory,
dc.languageenen
dc.rightsAll rights reserved
dc.rights.uri
dc.titleHappiness economics as technocracyen
dc.typeArticle
prism.endingPage244
prism.issueIdentifier2en
prism.publicationDate2020en
prism.publicationNameBehavioural Public Policyen
prism.startingPage236
prism.volume4en
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.46854
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-09-15en
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1017/bpp.2019.46en
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-07en
dc.contributor.orcidAlexandrova, Anna [0000-0002-3226-6044]
dc.identifier.eissn2398-0648
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
cam.issuedOnline2020-01-14en
cam.orpheus.successMon Jun 22 08:21:13 BST 2020 - Embargo updated*
cam.orpheus.counter13*
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate2020-01-01


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record