An ethnographic study of improving data collection and completeness in large-scale data exercises.
Wellcome open research
MetadataShow full item record
Dixon-Woods, M., Campbell, A., Aveling, E., & Martin, G. (2019). An ethnographic study of improving data collection and completeness in large-scale data exercises.. Wellcome open research, 4 203. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14993.1
Background: Large-scale data collection is an increasingly prominent and influential feature of efforts to improve healthcare delivery, yet securing the involvement of clinical centres and ensuring data comprehensiveness often proves problematic. We explore how improvements in both data submission and completion rates were achieved during a crucial period of the evolution of two large-scale data exercises. Methods: As part of an evaluation of a quality improvement programme, we conducted an ethnographic study involving 90 interviews and 47 days of non-participant observation of two UK national clinical audits in a period before submission of data on adherence to clinical standards became mandatory. Results: Critical to the improvements in submission and completion rates in the two exercises were the efforts of clinical leaders to refigure “data work” as a professionalization strategy. Using a series of strategic manoeuvres, leaders constructed a cultural account that tied the fortunes of the healthcare professions to the submission of high-quality data, proposing that it would demonstrate responsibility, transparency, and alignment with the public interest. In so doing, clinical leadership deployed tactics that might have been seen as unwarranted managerial aggression had they been imposed by parties external to the profession. Many residual challenges were linked not to principled objection by clinicians, but to mundane problems and frustrations in obtaining, recording, and submitting data. The cultural framing of data work as a professional duty was important to resolving its status as an abject form of labour. Conclusions: Improving data quality in large-scale exercises is possible, but requires cooperation with clinical centres. Enabling professional leadership of data work may offer some significant advantages, but attention is also needed to mundane and highly consequential obstacles to participation in data collection.
This study was supported by funding from a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator award (097899) and by the Health Foundation (registered charity 286967) as part of its evaluation of the Closing the Gap through Clinical Communities programme. Graham Martin's contribution was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands (CLAHRC EM). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. Mary Dixon-Woods and Graham Martin are supported by the Health Foundation's grant to the University of Cambridge for The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute. MDW is a senior investigator in the National Institute for Health Research. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, the Department of Health and Social Care, the Health Foundation, the Academy for Medical Sciences or the Wellcome Trust.
Wellcome Trust (097899/Z/11/Z)
Health Foundation (unknown)
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14993.1
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/300873
Attribution 4.0 International
Licence URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/