Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReed, Jamesen
dc.contributor.authorBarlow, Josen
dc.contributor.authorCarmenta, Rachelen
dc.contributor.authorvan Vianen, Joshen
dc.contributor.authorSunderland, Terryen
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-22T00:30:36Z
dc.date.available2020-02-22T00:30:36Z
dc.date.issued2019-10en
dc.identifier.issn0006-3207
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/302551
dc.description.abstract© 2019 The Authors Achieving equitable and sustainable development that supports climate change mitigation targets and avoids biodiversity loss remains a leading, and intractable challenge in many tropical countries. Sectorial thinking – focusing on just one aspect of the problem or system – is increasingly understood to be inadequate to address linked social-ecological challenges. Holistic approaches that incorporate diverse stakeholders across scales, sectors, and knowledge systems are gaining prominence for addressing complex problems. Such ‘integrated landscape approaches’ have received renewed momentum and interest from the research, donor and practitioner communities, and have been subsumed in international conventions related to climate, biodiversity, and sustainable development. However, implementation efforts and tangible evaluation of progress continues to lag behind conceptual development. Failure of landscape approaches to adequately engage diverse stakeholders—in design, implementation and evaluation—is a contributing factor to their poor performance. Here we draw on consultation workshops, advances in the literature, and our collective experience to identify key constraints and opportunities to better engage stakeholders in tropical landscape decision-making processes. Specifically, we ask: (1) what are the key challenges related to effectively engaging multiple stakeholders in integrated landscape approaches and (2) what lessons can be learned from practitioners, and how can these lessons serve as opportunities to avoid duplicating future research efforts or repeating past perceptions of underperformance. We present our findings within three broad categories: (i) navigating complexity, (ii) overcoming siloed thinking, and (iii) incentivizing behavioral change; thus providing a useful starting point for overcoming inherent challenges associated with engaging stakeholders in landscape approaches.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe International Climate Initiative (IKI) of the Federal Ministry for theEnvironment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety(BMUB) grant 18_IV_084. The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Forest and Biodiversity Office. National Environment Research Council grant NE/K016431/1. The Frank Jackson Foundation.
dc.format.mediumUndetermineden
dc.languageengen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleEngaging multiple stakeholders to reconcile climate, conservation and development objectives in tropical landscapesen
dc.typeArticle
prism.endingPageAvailable
prism.publicationDate2019en
prism.publicationNameBiological conservationen
prism.startingPageNot
prism.volume238en
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.49619
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-08-28en
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108229en
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-10en
dc.contributor.orcidCarmenta, Rachel [0000-0001-8607-4147]
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2917
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International