Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHardeman, Wendy
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorPears, Sally
dc.contributor.authorVan Emmenis, Miranda
dc.contributor.authorTheil, Florence
dc.contributor.authorGc, Vijay S.
dc.contributor.authorVasconcelos, Joana C.
dc.contributor.authorWestgate, Kate
dc.contributor.authorBrage, Søren
dc.contributor.authorSuhrcke, Marc
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, Simon J.
dc.contributor.authorKinmonth, Ann Louise
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Edward C. F.
dc.contributor.authorPrevost, A. Toby
dc.contributor.authorSutton, Stephen
dc.contributor.authoron behalf of the VBI Research Team
dc.description.abstractBackground: The majority of people do not achieve recommended levels of physical activity. There is a need for effective, scalable interventions to promote activity. Self-monitoring by pedometer is a potentially suitable strategy. We assessed the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a very brief (5-minute) pedometer-based intervention (‘Step It Up’) delivered as part of National Health Service (NHS) Health Checks in primary care. Methods and findings: The Very Brief Intervention (VBI) Trial was a two parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) with 3-month follow-up, conducted in 23 primary care practices in the East of England. Participants were 1,007 healthy adults aged 40 to 74 years eligible for an NHS Health Check. They were randomly allocated (1:1) using a web-based tool between October 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, to either intervention (505) or control group (502), stratified by primary care practice. Participants were aware of study group allocation. Control participants received the NHS Health Check only. Intervention participants additionally received Step It Up: a 5-minute face-to-face discussion, written materials, pedometer, and step chart. The primary outcome was accelerometer-based physical activity volume at 3-month follow-up adjusted for sex, 5-year age group, and general practice. Secondary outcomes included time spent in different intensities of physical activity, self-reported physical activity, and economic measures. We conducted an in-depth fidelity assessment on a subsample of Health Check consultations. Participants’ mean age was 56 years, two-thirds were female, they were predominantly white, and two-thirds were in paid employment. The primary outcome was available in 859 (85.3%) participants. There was no significant between-group difference in activity volume at 3 months (adjusted intervention effect 8.8 counts per minute [cpm]; 95% CI −18.7 to 36.3; p = 0.53). We found no significant between-group differences in the secondary outcomes of step counts per day, time spent in moderate or vigorous activity, time spent in vigorous activity, and time spent in moderate-intensity activity (accelerometer-derived variables); as well as in total physical activity, home-based activity, work-based activity, leisure-based activity, commuting physical activity, and screen or TV time (self-reported physical activity variables). Of the 505 intervention participants, 491 (97%) received the Step it Up intervention. Analysis of 37 intervention consultations showed that 60% of Step it Up components were delivered faithfully. The intervention cost £18.04 per participant. Incremental cost to the NHS per 1,000-step increase per day was £96 and to society was £239. Adverse events were reported by 5 intervention participants (of which 2 were serious) and 5 control participants (of which 2 were serious). The study’s limitations include a participation rate of 16% and low return of audiotapes by practices for fidelity assessment. Conclusions: In this large well-conducted trial, we found no evidence of effect of a plausible very brief pedometer intervention embedded in NHS Health Checks on objectively measured activity at 3-month follow-up. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN72691150).
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en
dc.subjectResearch Article
dc.subjectMedicine and health sciences
dc.subjectEngineering and technology
dc.subjectPeople and places
dc.subjectResearch and analysis methods
dc.subjectSocial sciences
dc.titleEvaluation of a very brief pedometer-based physical activity intervention delivered in NHS Health Checks in England: The VBI randomised controlled trial
prism.publicationNamePLOS Medicine
datacite.contributor.supervisoreditor: Sherrington, Catherine
dc.contributor.orcidHardeman, Wendy [0000-0002-6498-9407]
dc.contributor.orcidMitchell, Joanna [0000-0003-2138-3402]
dc.contributor.orcidPears, Sally [0000-0002-6417-1402]
dc.contributor.orcidGc, Vijay S. [0000-0003-0365-2605]
dc.contributor.orcidVasconcelos, Joana C. [0000-0001-7709-4058]
dc.contributor.orcidWestgate, Kate [0000-0002-0283-3562]
dc.contributor.orcidBrage, Søren [0000-0002-1265-7355]
dc.contributor.orcidSuhrcke, Marc [0000-0001-7263-8626]
dc.contributor.orcidGriffin, Simon J. [0000-0002-2157-4797]
dc.contributor.orcidWilson, Edward C. F. [0000-0002-8369-1577]
dc.contributor.orcidPrevost, A. Toby [0000-0003-1723-0796]
pubs.funder-project-idNational Institute for Health Research (RP-PG-0608-10079)
pubs.funder-project-idUK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/3)
pubs.funder-project-idNIHR Biomedical Research Centre Cambridge (IS-BRC-1215-20014)

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)