Hearing outcomes of cochlear implant recipients with pre-operatively identified cochlear dead regions.
dc.contributor.author | Shrivastava, MK | en |
dc.contributor.author | Eitutis, ST | en |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, JW | en |
dc.contributor.author | Axon, PR | en |
dc.contributor.author | Donnelly, NP | en |
dc.contributor.author | Tysome, JR | en |
dc.contributor.author | Bance, Manohar | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-06T23:30:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-06T23:30:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-05 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1467-0100 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/304127 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To determine how patients who did not meet UK TA166 NICE criteria for cochlear implantation (CI) but were subsequently found to have cochlear dead regions (DRs) performed with CI.Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was performed on CI recipients: 152 controls and 40 in the DR group. Of these, 34 pairs were matched by pre-operative Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) scores and compared.Results: The forty DR patients had a median age at implantation of 56 years. Their mean pre-operative BKB score of 23% increased to 78% after CI. Thirty-seven experienced improvements in BKB scores. In matched case-control analysis, the improvement in mean BKB score with CI was no different (p = 0.19) between the DR group and control group; a similar proportion of patients benefitted in each group.Discussion: This study is the largestreport to date of performance of patients with DRs, before and after CI. The DR group gain similar benefit as the controls.Conclusion: Patients with DRs, who did not meet TA166 NICE criteria, received the same benefit as those who did. TEN testing to detect DRs should be included in routine CI work-up where standard criteria are not met. | |
dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | en |
dc.language | eng | en |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | |
dc.rights | All rights reserved | |
dc.rights.uri | ||
dc.title | Hearing outcomes of cochlear implant recipients with pre-operatively identified cochlear dead regions. | en |
dc.type | Article | |
prism.endingPage | 166 | |
prism.issueIdentifier | 3 | en |
prism.publicationDate | 2020 | en |
prism.publicationName | Cochlear implants international | en |
prism.startingPage | 160 | |
prism.volume | 21 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17863/CAM.51212 | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-12-24 | en |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1080/14670100.2019.1707362 | en |
rioxxterms.version | AM | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | en |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2020-05 | en |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1754-7628 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en |
cam.orpheus.success | Wed Apr 15 08:29:52 BST 2020 - Embargo updated | * |
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate | 2020-12-29 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Cambridge University Research Outputs
Research outputs of the University of Cambridge