Comparison of the Helmholtz, Gibbs, and collective-modes methods to obtain nonaffine elastic constants: Comparison of methods to obtain nonaffine elastic constants
Accepted version
Peer-reviewed
Repository URI
Repository DOI
Change log
Authors
Cui, Bingyu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3653-8115
Terentjev, EM
Abstract
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd We review and compare the Born-Huang and the Lemaitre-Maloney theories that lead to analytical expressions for elastic constants, accounting for affine and nonaffine deformations in a lattice (or in a disordered solid). The Born-Huang method is based on Helmholtz free energy while the Lemaitre-Maloney formalism focus on the Gibbs ensemble with the focus on local force. Although starting from different perspectives, in the linear elastic limit, and in equilibrium, material elastic constants must be the same in all these methods. This is explicitly verified on examples of linear chains, and the numerical simulation of a non-centrosymmetric crystal.
Description
Keywords
Elasticity, Nonaffinity, Lattice
Journal Title
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
0022-5096
1873-4782
1873-4782
Volume Title
140
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Publisher DOI
Sponsorship
China Scholarship Council