Repository logo
 

Comparison of the Helmholtz, Gibbs, and collective-modes methods to obtain nonaffine elastic constants: Comparison of methods to obtain nonaffine elastic constants

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Terentjev, EM 

Abstract

© 2020 Elsevier Ltd We review and compare the Born-Huang and the Lemaitre-Maloney theories that lead to analytical expressions for elastic constants, accounting for affine and nonaffine deformations in a lattice (or in a disordered solid). The Born-Huang method is based on Helmholtz free energy while the Lemaitre-Maloney formalism focus on the Gibbs ensemble with the focus on local force. Although starting from different perspectives, in the linear elastic limit, and in equilibrium, material elastic constants must be the same in all these methods. This is explicitly verified on examples of linear chains, and the numerical simulation of a non-centrosymmetric crystal.

Description

Keywords

Elasticity, Nonaffinity, Lattice

Journal Title

Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0022-5096
1873-4782

Volume Title

140

Publisher

Elsevier BV
Sponsorship
China Scholarship Council