Intentions and instability: a defence of causal decision theory
Published version
Peer-reviewed
Repository URI
Repository DOI
Change log
Authors
Bales, Adam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9629-0318
Abstract
Abstract: Andy Egan has recently presented a prominent objection to causal decision theory (CDT). However, in this paper, I argue that this objection fails if CDT’s proponent accepts the plausible view that decision-theoretic options are intentions. This result both provides a defence of CDT against a prominent objection and highlights the importance of resolving the nature of decision-theoretic options.
Description
Keywords
Article, Causal decision theory, Intentions, Options
Journal Title
Philosophical Studies
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
0031-8116
1573-0883
1573-0883
Volume Title
177
Publisher
Springer Netherlands