Repository logo
 

A critical review of the Cochrane meta-analysis of routine late-pregnancy ultrasound.

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

No Thumbnail Available

Type

Article

Change log

Abstract

A Cochrane review of universal late-pregnancy ultrasound has been highly influential in guiding UK practice, concluding that it does not improve outcome. However, the meta-analysis combines trials that used diverse definitions of screen positive, were designed in the absence of high-quality data on diagnostic effectiveness and did not couple screening to an effective intervention. Moreover, even if the trials had combined a highly effective screening test with a highly effective intervention, the sample size was 15% of that required to study perinatal death. It is not known whether universal late-pregnancy ultrasound confers benefit on the mother or baby. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Despite >50 years of research, we do not know whether universal late-pregnancy ultrasound confers benefit on the mother or baby.

Description

Keywords

Meta-analysis, screening, ultrasound, Female, Humans, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Reproducibility of Results, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

Journal Title

BJOG

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1470-0328
1471-0528

Volume Title

128

Publisher

Wiley

Rights

All rights reserved