Screening archaeological bone for palaeogenetic and palaeoproteomic studies
Mullin, Victoria E.
Hansen, Henrik B.
Teasdale, Matthew D.
Allentoft, Morten E.
Bradley, Daniel G.
Collins, Matthew J.
Public Library of Science
MetadataShow full item record
Kontopoulos, I., Penkman, K., Mullin, V. E., Winkelbach, L., Unterländer, M., Scheu, A., Kreutzer, S., et al. (2020). Screening archaeological bone for palaeogenetic and palaeoproteomic studies. PLOS ONE, 15 (6) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235146
Funder: FP7 Ideas: European Research Council; funder-id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011199; Grant(s): 295729
The recovery and analysis of ancient DNA and protein from archaeological bone is time-consuming and expensive to carry out, while it involves the partial or complete destruction of valuable or rare specimens. The fields of palaeogenetic and palaeoproteomic research would benefit greatly from techniques that can assess the molecular quality prior to sampling. To be relevant, such screening methods should be effective, minimally-destructive, and rapid. This study reports results based on spectroscopic (Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy in attenuated total reflectance [FTIR-ATR]; n = 266), palaeoproteomic (collagen content; n = 226), and palaeogenetic (endogenous DNA content; n = 88) techniques. We establish thresholds for three different FTIR indices, a) the infrared splitting factor [IRSF] that assesses relative changes in bioapatite crystals’ size and homogeneity; b) the carbonate-to-phosphate [C/P] ratio as a relative measure of carbonate content in bioapatite crystals; and c) the amide-to-phosphate ratio [Am/P] for assessing the relative organic content preserved in bone. These thresholds are both extremely reliable and easy to apply for the successful and rapid distinction between well- and poorly-preserved specimens. This is a milestone for choosing appropriate samples prior to genomic and collagen analyses, with important implications for biomolecular archaeology and palaeontology.
Research Article, Biology and life sciences, Earth sciences, Social sciences, Ecology and environmental sciences
Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation (F ZL 047-1/2015-2016)
A.G. Leventis Foundation (PhD scholarship)
The Greek Archaeological Committee UK (GACUK) (PhD scholarship)
Leverhulme Trust (PLP-2012-116)
Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (DNRF128)
Villum Fonden (10120)
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235146
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/307293
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Licence URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: email@example.com