Repository logo
 

The pox in Boswell's London: an estimate of the extent of syphilis infection in the metropolis in the 1770s†

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Szreter, Simon 
Siena, Kevin 

Abstract

This article provides for the first time a robust quantitative estimate of the amount of syphilis infection in the population of London in the later eighteenth century. A measure of the cumulative incidence of having ever been treated for the pox by the age of 35 is constructed, providing an indicator of over 20 per cent syphilitic infection. The principal primary sources are hospital admissions registers, augmented with an analysis of London’s workhouse infirmaries. A range of potentially confounding factors are taken into account, including the contemporary conflation between syphilis and other sexually transmitted infections, patients who shunned hospitals in favour of private treatment, possible double-counting of patients, institutional patients who may have hailed from outside London, and the complexity of establishing what should constitute the ‘at-risk’ population of London for this period. Cultural and medical historians have demonstrated considerable pre-occupation with venereal disease in the texts of the eighteenth century, while demographic and epidemiological historians, lacking any quantitative evidence, have tended to ignore the disease. This article can now demonstrate for the first time just how extensive syphilis was likely to have been and, by doing so, offer an original contribution to major debates in the history of sexuality and the demography of early modern London.

Description

Keywords

4303 Historical Studies, 50 Philosophy and Religious Studies, 43 History, Heritage and Archaeology, 5002 History and Philosophy Of Specific Fields, Infectious Diseases, Rare Diseases, Infection, 3 Good Health and Well Being

Journal Title

The Economic History Review

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0013-0117
1468-0289

Volume Title

0

Publisher

Wiley
Sponsorship
Wellcome Trust (088708/Z/09/Z)
The research for this article was in part facilitated by the funding under the five-year Wellcome Trust Strategic Award 088708, ‘Generation to reproduction’, held at Cambridge University’s History and Philosophy of Science Department, for which Simon Szreter was a co-applicant.