Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGuazzini, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorGuidi, Elisa
dc.contributor.authorCecchini, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorYoneki, Eiko
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-15T00:16:25Z
dc.date.available2020-07-15T00:16:25Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-13
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/307974
dc.description.abstractWorldwide, organizations and small and medium-sized enterprises have already disruptively changed in many ways their physiological inner mechanisms, because of information and communication technologies (ICT) revolution. Nevertheless, the still ongoing COVID-19 worldwide emergency definitely promoted a wide adoption of teleworking modalities for many people around the world, making it more relevant than before to understand the real impact of virtual environments (VEs) on teamwork dynamics. From a psychological point of view, a critical question about teleworking modalities is how the social and cognitive dynamics of collaborative facilitation and collaborative inhibition would affect teamwork within VEs. This study analyzed the impact of a virtual environment (VE) on the recall of individuals and members of nominal and collaborative groups. The research assessed costs and benefits for collaborative retrieval by testing the effect of experimental conditions, stimulus materials, group size, experimental conditions order, anxiety state, personality traits, gender group composition and social interactions. A total of 144 participants were engaged in a virtual Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) classical paradigm, which involved remembering word lists across two successive sessions, in one of four protocols: I-individual/nominal, I I - nominal/individual, I I I - nominal/collaborative, I V - collaborative/nominal. Results suggested, in general, a reduced collaborative inhibition effect in the collaborative condition than the nominal and individual condition. A combined effect between experimental condition and difficulty of the task appears to explain the presence of collaborative inhibition or facilitation. Nominal groups appeared to enhance the collaborative groups’ performance when virtual nominal groups come before collaborative groups. Variables such as personality traits, gender and social interactions may have a contribution to collaborative retrieval. In conclusion, this study indicated how VEs could maintain those peculiar social dynamics characterizing the participants’ engagement in a task, both working together and individually, and could affect their intrinsic motivation as well as performances. These results could be exploited in order to design brand new and evidenced-based practices, to improve teleworking procedures and workers well-being, as well as teleworking teamwork effectiveness.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectvirtual dynamics
dc.subjectcollaborative inhibition
dc.subjectcollaborative facilitation
dc.subjectDRM paradigm
dc.subjectvirtual teamwork
dc.titleCollaborative Facilitation and Collaborative Inhibition in Virtual Environments
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2020-07-15T00:16:25Z
prism.issueIdentifier7
prism.publicationNameFuture Internet
prism.volume12
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.55066
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-07-12
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3390/fi12070118
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.identifier.eissn1999-5903


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)