Repository logo
 

Science and Philosophy: A Loveā€“Hate Relationship

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Change log

Abstract

In this paper I review the problematic relationship between science and philosophy; in particular, I will address the question of whether science needs philosophy, and I will offer some positive perspectives that should be helpful in developing a synergetic relationship between the two. I will review three lines of reasoning often employed in arguing that philosophy is useless for science: a) philosophy's death diagnosis ('philosophy is dead'); b) the historic-agnostic argument/challenge "show me examples where philosophy has been useful for science, for I don't know of any"; c) the division of property argument (or: philosophy and science have different subject matters, therefore philosophy is useless for science). These arguments will be countered with three contentions to the effect that the natural sciences need philosophy. I will: a) point to the fallacy of anti-philosophicalism (or: 'in order to deny the need for philosophy, one must do philosophy') and examine the role of paradigms and presuppositions (or: why science can't live without philosophy); b) point out why the historical argument fails (in an example from quantum mechanics, alive and kicking); c) briefly sketch some domains of intersection of science and philosophy and how the two can have mutual synergy. I will conclude with some implications of this synergetic relationship between science and philosophy for the liberal arts and sciences.

Description

Funder: Trinity College, University of Cambridge; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000727

Keywords

Philosophy of science, Science and philosophy, Heuristics, Liberal arts and sciences

Journal Title

Foundations of Science

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1233-1821
1572-8471

Volume Title

25

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC