Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnna, Middleton
dc.contributor.authorChristine, Patch
dc.contributor.authorJonathan, Roberts
dc.contributor.authorRichard, Milne
dc.contributor.authorAlessia, Costa
dc.contributor.authorLauren, Robarts
dc.contributor.authorJerome, Atutornu
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T15:07:45Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T15:07:45Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-08
dc.date.submitted2020-03-05
dc.identifier.issn1018-4813
dc.identifier.others41431-020-0663-3
dc.identifier.other663
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/310617
dc.description.abstractAbstract: The legal duty to protect patient confidentiality is common knowledge amongst healthcare professionals. However, what may not be widely known, is that this duty is not always absolute. In the United Kingdom, both the General Medical Council governing the practice of all doctors, as well as many other professional codes of practice recognise that, under certain circumstances, it may be appropriate to break confidentiality. This arises when there is a wider duty to protect the health of others, and when the risk of non-disclosure outweighs the potential harm from breaking confidentiality. We discuss this situation specifically in relation to genomic medicine where relatives in a family may have differing views on the sharing of familial genetic information. Overruling a patient’s wishes is predicated on balancing the duty of care towards the patient versus protecting their relative from serious harm. We discuss the practice implications of a pivotal legal case that concluded recently in the High Court of Justice in England and Wales, ABC v St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust & Ors. Professional guidance is already clear that genetic healthcare professionals must undertake a balancing exercise to weigh up contradictory duties of care. However, the judge has provided a new legal weighting to these professional duties: ‘The scope of the duty extends not only to conducting the necessary balancing exercise but also to acting in accordance with its outcome’ [1: 189]. In the context of genomic medicine, this has important consequences for clinical practice.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishing
dc.subjectViewpoint
dc.subject/692/700/3935
dc.subject/706/689
dc.subjectviewpoint
dc.titleProfessional duties are now considered legal duties of care within genomic medicine
dc.typeOther
dc.date.updated2020-09-23T15:07:44Z
prism.endingPage1304
prism.issueIdentifier10
prism.publicationNameEuropean Journal of Human Genetics
prism.startingPage1301
prism.volume28
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.57714
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-05-19
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1038/s41431-020-0663-3
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.contributor.orcidAnna, Middleton [0000-0003-3103-8098]
dc.contributor.orcidRichard, Milne [0000-0002-8770-2384]
dc.identifier.eissn1476-5438
pubs.funder-project-idWellcome Trust (Wellcome) (206194, 206194, 206194, 206194, 206194, 206194)


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record