Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBales, Adamen
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-10T00:30:07Z
dc.date.available2020-11-10T00:30:07Z
dc.identifier.issn0004-8402
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/312646
dc.description.abstractWhile pragmatic arguments are traditionally seen as supporting decision theory, recent discussions suggest the possibility of pragmatic arguments against this theory. I respond to two such arguments and clarify what it would take for arguments of this sort to succeed.
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.rightsAll rights reserved
dc.rights.uri
dc.titleBad Apples and Broken Ladders: A Pragmatic Defence of Causal Decision Theoryen
dc.typeArticle
prism.publicationNameAustralasian Journal of Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.59744
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-10-21en
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-10-21en
dc.contributor.orcidBales, Adam [0000-0002-9629-0318]
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
cam.orpheus.counter11*
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate2023-11-09


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record