Face-to-Face Compared With Online Collected Accounts of Health and Illness Experiences: A Scoping Review.
LeClair, Karissa L
Qual Health Res
MetadataShow full item record
Davies, L., LeClair, K. L., Bagley, P., Blunt, H., Hinton, L., Ryan, S., & Ziebland, S. (2020). Face-to-Face Compared With Online Collected Accounts of Health and Illness Experiences: A Scoping Review.. Qual Health Res, 30 (13), 2092-2102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320935835
Advocates of online alternatives to face-to-face interviewing suggest online approaches save money and time, whereas others have raised concerns about the quality and content of the resulting data. These issues affect researchers designing and costing their studies and application reviewers and research funders. We conducted a scoping review of English language articles describing the range of online alternative approaches. Furthermore, we systematically identified studies directly comparing online alternatives with face-to-face approaches. Synthesis of these 11 articles (565 participants) suggests that online alternatives should not be viewed as a straightforward replacement for face-to-face, a particularly important finding given the rapid communication changes occurring in the COVID-19 pandemic. When applied with consideration of the evolving evidence on their strengths and weaknesses, online methods may increase the likelihood of obtaining the desired sample, but responses are shorter, less contextual information is obtained, and relational satisfaction and consensus development are lower.
Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Coronavirus Infections, Data Collection, Focus Groups, Communication, Qualitative Research, Research Design, Internet, Interviews as Topic, Pandemics, Data Accuracy, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320935835
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/315318
All rights reserved