Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchulz, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorAdams, William M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-08T17:22:26Z
dc.date.available2021-01-08T17:22:26Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-21
dc.date.submitted2020-02-13
dc.identifier.issn1862-4065
dc.identifier.others11625-020-00870-2
dc.identifier.other870
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/315935
dc.descriptionFunder: University of Cambridge
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Dam planning and construction is notoriously difficult. It is highly complex, involving a multitude of social, environmental, economic and technological questions that often become politicised in the process; negative impacts are often concentrated on small, vulnerable groups within society, while the benefits are typically spread in a much more diffuse pattern; it requires changing riverine ecosystems, often irreversibly so; and it takes a very long time, with often harsh consequences if mistakes are made. These challenges have generated decades of debate around dams and development, yet it is not clear how dam planning and management can be improved. To address this question, the present study used Q methodology to analyse the views of social and environmental researchers on dams in Latin America on the principles that should guide dam development. The Q analysis rendered three idealised viewpoints: The first suggested that defending the rights of vulnerable people should be the main priority, as a counterbalance to the natural bias towards economically and politically powerful actors within the political economy of dam construction. The second implied adoption of a holistic and scientific vision towards dam decision-making and a focus of efforts on perfecting formal procedures and participatory processes to build better dams in the future. The third called into question the need for dams altogether and concentrated attention on invisible and overlooked aspects of dam decision-making, particularly past injustices, and the rights of indigenous communities to determine their own model of development. Each viewpoint represents an alternative vision for future dam planning and clarifies the choices available to policy-makers and development actors. Moreover, viewpoints give insights into the motivations of those who seek to inform debates on dams and development. While they were identified in the context of dam-decision making, our findings may also be relevant to other fields of sustainable development.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer Japan
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectOriginal Article
dc.subjectWater Resource Management and Hydrology
dc.subjectDam impacts
dc.subjectLatin America
dc.subjectPolitical ecology
dc.subjectQ methodology
dc.subjectRiver basin planning
dc.subjectSustainable water resources development
dc.titleIn search of the good dam: contemporary views on dam planning in Latin America
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2021-01-08T17:22:25Z
prism.endingPage269
prism.issueIdentifier1
prism.publicationNameSustainability Science
prism.startingPage255
prism.volume16
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.63046
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-09-30
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s11625-020-00870-2
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.contributor.orcidSchulz, Christopher [0000-0002-0206-2390]
dc.identifier.eissn1862-4057
pubs.funder-project-idGlobal Challenges Research Fund, Economic and Social Research Council, UK (ES/P011373/1)


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)