Repository logo
 

Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (Q-CHAT). A population screening study with follow-up: the case for multiple time-point screening for autism

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Change log

Authors

Ruta, Liliana 
Pasco, Greg 
Soufer, Renee 

Abstract

Objective: This is a prospective population screening study for autism in toddlers aged 18–30 months old using the Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (Q-CHAT), with follow-up at age 4. Design: Observational study. Setting: Luton, Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire in the UK. Participants: 13 070 toddlers registered on the Child Health Surveillance Database between March 2008 and April 2009, with follow-up at age 4; 3770 (29%) were screened for autism at 18–30 months using the Q-CHAT and the Childhood Autism Spectrum Test (CAST) at follow-up at age 4. Interventions: A stratified sample across the Q-CHAT score distribution was invited for diagnostic assessment (phase 1). The 4-year follow-up included the CAST and the Checklist for Referral (CFR). All with CAST ≥15, phase 1 diagnostic assessment or with developmental concerns on the CFR were invited for diagnostic assessment (phase 2). Standardised diagnostic assessment at both time-points was conducted to establish the test accuracy of the Q-CHAT. Main outcome measures: Consensus diagnostic outcome at phase 1 and phase 2. Results: At phase 1, 3770 Q-CHATs were returned (29% response) and 121 undertook diagnostic assessment, of whom 11 met the criteria for autism. All 11 screened positive on the Q-CHAT. The positive predictive value (PPV) at a cut-point of 39 was 17% (95% CI 8% to 31%). At phase 2, 2005 of 3472 CASTs and CFRs were returned (58% response). 159 underwent diagnostic assessment, including 82 assessed in phase 1. All children meeting the criteria for autism identified via the Q-CHAT at phase 1 also met the criteria at phase 2. The PPV was 28% (95% CI 15% to 46%) after phase 1 and phase 2. Conclusions: The Q-CHAT can be used at 18–30 months to identify autism and enable accelerated referral for diagnostic assessment. The low PPV suggests that for every true positive there would, however, be ~4–5 false positives. At follow-up, new cases were identified, illustrating the need for continued surveillance and rescreening at multiple time-points using developmentally sensitive instruments. Not all children who later receive a diagnosis of autism are detectable during the toddler period.

Description

Funder: Autism Research Trust


Funder: National Lottery Community Fund; FundRef: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013529


Funder: Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC)

Keywords

Screening, 1506, autism, screening

Journal Title

BMJ Paediatrics Open

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

2399-9772

Volume Title

5

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group
Sponsorship
Wellcome Trust (214322\Z\18\Z)