An RCT of a decision aid to support informed choices about taking aspirin to prevent colorectal cancer and other chronic diseases: a study protocol for the SITA (Should I Take Aspirin?) trial.
View / Open Files
Authors
Macrae, Finlay
Chondros, Patty
Trevena, Lyndal
Jenkins, Mark
Taylor, Natalie
Boyd, Lucy
Karnchanachari, Napin
Novy, Kitty
Forbes, Carmody
Gutierrez, Javiera Martinez
Broun, Kate
Whitburn, Sara
McGill, Sarah
Fishman, George
Marker, Julie
Shub, Max
Publication Date
2021-07-15Journal Title
Trials
ISSN
1745-6215
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
452
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Physical Medium
Electronic
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Milton, S., McIntosh, J., Macrae, F., Chondros, P., Trevena, L., Jenkins, M., Walter, F., et al. (2021). An RCT of a decision aid to support informed choices about taking aspirin to prevent colorectal cancer and other chronic diseases: a study protocol for the SITA (Should I Take Aspirin?) trial.. Trials, 22 (1), 452. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05365-8
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Australian guidelines recommend that all people aged 50-70 years old actively consider taking daily low-dose aspirin (100-300 mg per day) for 2.5 to 5 years to reduce their risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite the change of national CRC prevention guidelines, there has been no active implementation of the guidelines into clinical practice. We aim to test the efficacy of a health consultation and decision aid, using a novel expected frequency tree (EFT) to present the benefits and harms of low dose aspirin prior to a general practice consultation with patients aged 50-70 years, on informed decision-making and uptake of aspirin. METHODS: Approximately five to seven general practices in Victoria, Australia, will be recruited to participate. Patients 50-70 years old, attending an appointment with their general practitioner (GP) for any reason, will be invited to participate in the trial. Two hundred fifty-eight eligible participants will be randomly allocated 1:1 to intervention or active control arms using a computer-generated allocation sequence stratified by general practice, sex, and mode of trial delivery (face-to-face or teletrial). There are two co-primary outcomes: informed decision-making at 1-month post randomisation, measured by the Multi-dimensional Measure of Informed Choice (MMIC), and self-reported daily use of aspirin at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include decisional conflict at 1-month and other behavioural changes to reduce CRC risk at both time points. DISCUSSION: This trial will test the efficacy of novel methods for implementing national guidelines to support informed decision-making about taking aspirin in 50-70-year-olds to reduce the risk of CRC and other chronic diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12620001003965 . Registered on 10 October 2020.
Keywords
Humans, Colorectal Neoplasms, Chronic Disease, Aspirin, Decision Support Techniques, Aged, Middle Aged, Victoria, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05365-8
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/327610
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.