Intra-Tumour Heterogeneity Is One of the Main Sources of Inter-Observer Variation in Scoring Stromal Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.
View / Open Files
Authors
Kilmartin, Darren
O'Loughlin, Mark
Andreu, Xavier
Bagó-Horváth, Zsuzsanna
Chmielik, Ewa
Figueiredo, Paulo
Floris, Giuseppe
Kovács, Anikó
Heikkilä, Päivi
Kulka, Janina
Laenkholm, Anne-Vibeke
Liepniece-Karele, Inta
Provenzano, Elena
Reiner, Angelika
Ryška, Aleš
Quinn, Cecily
Zolota, Vasiliki
Webber, Mark
Callagy, Grace
Publication Date
2021-08-31Journal Title
Cancers (Basel)
ISSN
2072-6694
Publisher
MDPI AG
Volume
13
Issue
17
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Kilmartin, D., O'Loughlin, M., Andreu, X., Bagó-Horváth, Z., Bianchi, S., Chmielik, E., Cserni, G., et al. (2021). Intra-Tumour Heterogeneity Is One of the Main Sources of Inter-Observer Variation in Scoring Stromal Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.. Cancers (Basel), 13 (17) https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174410
Abstract
Stromal tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are a strong prognostic marker in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Consistency scoring sTILs is good and was excellent when an internet-based scoring aid developed by the TIL-WG was used to score cases in a reproducibility study. This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of sTILs assessment using this scoring aid in cases from routine practice and to explore the potential of the tool to overcome variability in scoring. Twenty-three breast pathologists scored sTILs in digitized slides of 49 TNBC biopsies using the scoring aid. Subsequently, fields of view (FOV) from each case were selected by one pathologist and scored by the group using the tool. Inter-observer agreement was good for absolute sTILs (ICC 0.634, 95% CI 0.539-0.735, p < 0.001) but was poor to fair using binary cutpoints. sTILs heterogeneity was the main contributor to disagreement. When pathologists scored the same FOV from each case, inter-observer agreement was excellent for absolute sTILs (ICC 0.798, 95% CI 0.727-0.864, p < 0.001) and good for the 20% (ICC 0.657, 95% CI 0.561-0.756, p < 0.001) and 40% (ICC 0.644, 95% CI 0.546-0.745, p < 0.001) cutpoints. However, there was a wide range of scores for many cases. Reproducibility scoring sTILs is good when the scoring aid is used. Heterogeneity is the main contributor to variance and will need to be overcome for analytic validity to be achieved.
Keywords
Reproducibility, Breast cancer, TILs, Triple Negative, Stils, International Immuno-oncology Biomarker Working Group
Identifiers
PMC8431498, 34503219
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174410
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/329332
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.