Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBergin, Aislinn D.
dc.contributor.authorVallejos, Elvira Perez
dc.contributor.authorDavies, E. Bethan
dc.contributor.authorDaley, David
dc.contributor.authorFord, Tamsin
dc.contributor.authorHarold, Gordon
dc.contributor.authorHetrick, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorKidner, Megan
dc.contributor.authorLong, Yunfei
dc.contributor.authorMerry, Sally
dc.contributor.authorMorriss, Richard
dc.contributor.authorSayal, Kapil
dc.contributor.authorSonuga-Barke, Edmund
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Jo
dc.contributor.authorTorous, John
dc.contributor.authorHollis, Chris
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-18T08:44:50Z
dc.date.available2021-10-18T08:44:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-15
dc.date.submitted2020-04-06
dc.identifier.others41746-020-00339-7
dc.identifier.other339
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/329501
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Digital health interventions (DHIs) have frequently been highlighted as one way to respond to increasing levels of mental health problems in children and young people. Whilst many are developed to address existing mental health problems, there is also potential for DHIs to address prevention and early intervention. However, there are currently limitations in the design and reporting of the development, evaluation and implementation of preventive DHIs that can limit their adoption into real-world practice. This scoping review aimed to examine existing evidence-based DHI interventions and review how well the research literature described factors that researchers need to include in their study designs and reports to support real-world implementation. A search was conducted for relevant publications published from 2013 onwards. Twenty-one different interventions were identified from 30 publications, which took a universal (n = 12), selective (n = 3) and indicative (n = 15) approach to preventing poor mental health. Most interventions targeted adolescents, with only two studies including children aged ≤10 years. There was limited reporting of user co-design involvement in intervention development. Barriers and facilitators to implementation varied across the delivery settings, and only a minority reported financial costs involved in delivering the intervention. This review found that while there are continued attempts to design and evaluate DHIs for children and young people, there are several points of concern. More research is needed with younger children and those from poorer and underserved backgrounds. Co-design processes with children and young people should be recognised and reported as a necessary component within DHI research as they are an important factor in the design and development of interventions, and underpin successful adoption and implementation. Reporting the type and level of human support provided as part of the intervention is also important in enabling the sustained use and implementation of DHIs.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group UK
dc.subjectReview Article
dc.subject/631/477
dc.subject/692/308
dc.subjectreview-article
dc.titlePreventive digital mental health interventions for children and young people: a review of the design and reporting of research
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2021-10-18T08:44:49Z
prism.issueIdentifier1
prism.publicationNamenpj Digital Medicine
prism.volume3
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.76949
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-09-18
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1038/s41746-020-00339-7
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.contributor.orcidBergin, Aislinn D. [0000-0002-4276-3466]
dc.identifier.eissn2398-6352


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record