Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBacevic, Jana
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-19T23:30:05Z
dc.date.available2021-10-19T23:30:05Z
dc.identifier.issn2471-9560
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/329633
dc.description.abstractIt is a testament to the lasting influence of Karl Popper and Richard Rorty that their work continues to provide inspiration for debates concerning the role and purpose of knowledge, democracy, and intellectuals in society. Alternatively, it is a testament to the recurrence of the problem that continues to lurk under the glossy analytical surface or occasional normative consensus of these debates: the impossibility to reconcile the concepts of liberal and epistemic democracy. Essays collected under the title Democratic Problem-Solving (Cruickshank and Sassower 2017) offer grounds for both assumptions, so this is what my review will focus on.
dc.publisherSocial Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectknowledge
dc.subjectpolitics
dc.subjectepistemology
dc.subjectdemocracy
dc.titleSolving the Democratic Problem: A Review of Cruickshank's and Sassower's Democratic Problem Solving
dc.typeArticle
prism.endingPage52
prism.issueIdentifier5
prism.publicationNameSocial Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
prism.startingPage50
prism.volume6
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.77082
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.contributor.orcidBacevic, Jana [0000-0002-1801-5222]
dc.publisher.urlhttp://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3Bl
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
cam.issuedOnline2017-05-26
dc.identifier.urlhttp://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3Bl


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International