Reproductive outcomes in women and men using complementary and alternative medicine treatment and not receiving artificial reproductive technology: a systematic review
Yogasundram, Hannah M.
Hui, Andrew J. O.
Sia, Clifford Y. S.
Chui, Anthea C.
Waldock, William J.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
MetadataShow full item record
Yogasundram, H. M., Hui, A. J. O., Sia, C. Y. S., Chui, A. C., Waldock, W. J., Quenby, S., Brown, E., & et al. (2020). Reproductive outcomes in women and men using complementary and alternative medicine treatment and not receiving artificial reproductive technology: a systematic review. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 303 (3), 821-835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05836-4
Funder: Medical Research Council (GB)
Funder: British Heart Foundation; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000274
Funder: Homerton College, University of Cambridge; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100008420
Funder: University of Cambridge
Abstract: Purpose: Infertility is a global problem, but only a minority of couples access assisted reproductive technologies due to financial and sociocultural barriers. Complementary and alternative medicine are seen as another option. We aimed to determine the impact of complementary and alternative medicine on conception, miscarriage and live birth rates in couples not receiving assisted reproductive technology treatments. Methods: The electronic databases EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science and the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database were systematically searched before March 24th 2020. Reference lists of eligible studies were searched for relevant studies. Eligible studies included trials and observational studies that assessed a complementary or alternative medicine and conception, miscarriage or live births in men or women not undergoing fertility treatment. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers using a pre-designed data collection form. The study protocol was published in the PROSPERO database (CRD42018086980). Results: Twenty randomized controlled trials were identified, including 2748 individuals. Most studies did not demonstrate any effect of a complementary or alternative medicine on pregnancy, live birth or miscarriage rates. Limited evidence was found for a positive effect of herbal therapies taken by women on conception rates. There was substantial diversity in quality across the studies. Conclusion: There is limited evidence of the effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine on improving the chances of conception and live births, or increasing miscarriage risk. Owing to the generally sub-optimal quality and heterogeneous nature of the evidence, rigorous studies are needed to determine the impact of complementary and alternative medicine on fertility.
Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Pregnancy, Conception, Live births, Miscarriage, Complementary medicine, Alternative medicine
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05836-4
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/329669