How should we evaluate sweetened beverage tax policies? A review of worldwide experience
Publication Date
2021-10-26Journal Title
BMC Public Health
Publisher
BioMed Central
Volume
21
Issue
1
Language
en
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Ng, S. W., Colchero, M. A., & White, M. (2021). How should we evaluate sweetened beverage tax policies? A review of worldwide experience. BMC Public Health, 21 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11984-2
Description
Funder: Laura and John Arnold Foundation; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009827
Funder: Bloomberg Philanthropies
Funder: Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica (MX)
Funder: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003141
Funder: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865
Abstract
Abstract: Over 45 jurisdictions globally have implemented sweetened beverage taxes. Researchers and policymakers need to assess whether and how these taxes change beverage demand and supply, their intended and unanticipated health, economic and equity impacts. Lessons from such evaluations can maximise the policies’ success and impact on non-communicable disease prevention globally. We discuss key theoretical, design and methodological considerations to help policymakers, funders and researchers commission and conduct rigorous evaluations of these policies and related disease prevention efforts. We encourage involving the perspectives of various stakeholders on what evaluations are needed given the specific context, what data and methods are appropriate, readily available or can be collected within time and budget constraints. A logic model /conceptual system map of anticipated implications across sectors and scales should help identify optimal study design, analytical techniques and measures. These models should be updated when synthesising findings across diverse methods and integrating findings across subpopulations using similar methods.
Keywords
Research in Practice, Sugar-sweetened beverage, Tax, Evaluation, Policy, Logic models
Sponsorship
National Institutes of Health (DK098072, DK056350, P2C HD050924)
National Institute for Health Research (16/130/01)
Medical Research Council (UK) (MC/UU/12015/6)
National Institute for Health Research (UK) (ES/G007462/1 and MR/K023187/1)
Wellcome Trust (087636/Z/08/Z)
Identifiers
s12889-021-11984-2, 11984
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11984-2
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/329969
Rights
Licence:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.