Climate-smart cocoa governance risks entrenching old hegemonies in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana: a multiple environmentality analysis
View / Open Files
Authors
Maguire-Rajpaul, VA
Sandbrook, C
McDermott, C
Hirons, MA
Publication Date
2022Journal Title
Geoforum
ISSN
0016-7185
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Maguire-Rajpaul, V., Sandbrook, C., McDermott, C., & Hirons, M. (2022). Climate-smart cocoa governance risks entrenching old hegemonies in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana: a multiple environmentality analysis. Geoforum https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.09.015
Abstract
Smallholders in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana supply over 60% of the cocoa to the $120bn global chocolate industry. Like colonialists and multilateral banks before them, foreign chocolate corporations today attempt to govern the behaviour of smallholders in Ivorian and Ghanaian forests via a recent proliferation of ‘climate-smart’ cocoa (CSC) schemes. In this article, we seek to understand what is new and different – if anything – about contemporary, climate-smart governance of cocoa and forests. To do this, we apply and temporally extend Fletcher's ‘multiple environmentalities’ framework to classify the various techniques by which smallholder behaviour has been steered throughout the history of cocoa and forest governance, comparing the cases of Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana by drawing on interviews with 200 smallholders and documentary analysis. This framework parses diverse ‘techniques of government’ used to shape subjects’ behaviour, including: sovereign (imposing laws), disciplinary (internalising norms), neoliberal (constructing material incentives), and liberation (emancipatory self-rule). We show that across all eras and in both countries – despite divergent political economies – smallholder behaviour has been predominantly governed by overlapping neoliberal and sovereign governmentalities, whose legitimacy has increasingly relied on reframing smallholders as environmental subjects. We demonstrate how smallholder voices remain marginalised and argue that corporate-led CSC schemes build upon and re-employ past sovereign powers (e.g., threatening to evict smallholders from protected forests), thus entrenching long-standing power asymmetries and overlooking critical differences between countries. Notably, cross-border corporate governance schemes ignore, and thereby (unwittingly) inflame, Ivorian violence and ethnoreligious strife.
Keywords
Environmentality, Cocoa, Forests, Neoliberal, Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana
Sponsorship
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/J500112/1)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.09.015
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/330363
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Licence URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk