Prospective trial of different antimicrobial treatment durations for presumptive canine urinary tract infections
Authors
Pouwels, Koen B.
Bazelle, Julien
Caddy, Sarah
Cauvin, Andria
De Risio, Luisa
Swann, James
Warland, James
Kent, Andrew
Publication Date
2021-09-06Journal Title
BMC Veterinary Research
Publisher
BioMed Central
Volume
17
Issue
1
Language
en
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Allerton, F., Pouwels, K. B., Bazelle, J., Caddy, S., Cauvin, A., De Risio, L., Swann, J., et al. (2021). Prospective trial of different antimicrobial treatment durations for presumptive canine urinary tract infections. BMC Veterinary Research, 17 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02974-y
Abstract
Abstract: Background: Avoidance of unnecessary antimicrobial administration is a key tenet of antimicrobial stewardship; knowing the optimal duration of therapy obviates over-treatment. However, little research has been performed to establish course lengths for common canine infections. In clinical practice, antimicrobial therapy is frequently prescribed in dogs presenting lower urinary tract signs (haematuria, pollakiuria and dysuria/stranguria). The proposed length of treatment in International Consensus guidelines has decreased with each iteration, but these recommendations remain arbitrary and largely extrapolated from experience in people. Methods: The objective of this prospective, multi-centre study is to find the shortest course duration that is non-inferior to the standard duration of 7 days of amoxicillin/clavulanate in terms of clinical outcomes for female dogs with lower urinary tract signs consistent with a urinary tract infection. An electronic data capture platform will be used by participating veterinarians working in clinical practice in the United Kingdom. Eligible dogs must be female, aged between 6 months and 10 years and have lower urinary tract signs of up to seven days’ duration. Enrolment will be offered in cases where the case clinician intends to prescribe antimicrobial therapy. Automatic pseudo-randomisation to treatment group will be based on the day of presentation (Monday-Friday); all antimicrobial courses will be completed on the Sunday after presentation generating different treatment durations. Follow-up data will be collected 1, 8 and 22–26 days after completion of the antimicrobial course to ensure effective safety netting, and to monitor short-term outcome and recurrence rates. Informed owner consent will be obtained in all cases. The study is approved by the Ethical Review Board of the University of Nottingham and has an Animal Test Certificate from the Veterinary Medicine’s Directorate. Discussion: This study has been designed to mirror current standards of clinical management; conclusions should therefore, be widely applicable and guide practising veterinarians in their antimicrobial decision-making process. A duration-response curve will be created allowing determination of the optimal treatment duration for the management of female dogs with lower urinary tract signs. It is hoped that these results will contribute valuable information to improve future antimicrobial stewardship as part of a wider one-health perspective.
Keywords
Study Protocol, Nephrology and urology, Combatting veterinary antimicrobial resistance (AMR), Antimicrobial stewardship, Antimicrobial resistance, duration, Urinary tract infection, Canine, Duration-response curve
Identifiers
s12917-021-02974-y, 2974
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02974-y
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/330432
Rights
Licence:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk