The impact of participant mental health on attendance and engagement in a trial of behavioural weight management programmes: secondary analysis of the WRAP randomised controlled trial
Authors
Mueller, Julia
Sharp, Stephen J.
Vincent, Ann
Duschinsky, Robbie
Griffin, Simon J.
Ahern, Amy L.
Publication Date
2021-11-07Journal Title
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Publisher
BioMed Central
Volume
18
Issue
1
Language
en
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Jones, R. A., Mueller, J., Sharp, S. J., Vincent, A., Duschinsky, R., Griffin, S. J., & Ahern, A. L. (2021). The impact of participant mental health on attendance and engagement in a trial of behavioural weight management programmes: secondary analysis of the WRAP randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 18 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01216-6
Abstract
Abstract: Background: Low attendance and engagement in behavioural weight management trials are common. Mental health may play an important role, however previous research exploring this association is limited with inconsistent findings. We aimed to investigate whether mental health was associated with attendance and engagement in a trial of behavioural weight management programmes. Methods: This is a secondary data analysis of the Weight loss referrals for adults in primary care (WRAP) trial, which randomised 1267 adults with overweight or obesity to brief intervention, WW (formerly Weight Watchers) for 12-weeks, or WW for 52-weeks. We used regression analyses to assess the association of baseline mental health (depression and anxiety (by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), quality of life (by EQ5D), satisfaction with life (by Satisfaction with Life Questionnaire)) with programme attendance and engagement in WW groups, and trial attendance in all randomised groups. Results: Every one unit of baseline depression score was associated with a 1% relative reduction in rate of WW session attendance in the first 12 weeks (Incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.99; 95% CI 0.98, 0.999). Higher baseline anxiety was associated with 4% lower odds to report high engagement with WW digital tools (Odds ratio [OR] 0.96; 95% CI 0.94, 0.99). Every one unit of global quality of life was associated with 69% lower odds of reporting high engagement with the WW mobile app (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.15, 0.64). Greater symptoms of depression and anxiety and lower satisfaction with life at baseline were consistently associated with lower odds of attending study visits at 3-, 12-, 24-, and 60-months. Conclusions: Participants were less likely to attend programme sessions, engage with resources, and attend study assessments when reporting poorer baseline mental health. Differences in attendance and engagement were small, however changes may still have a meaningful effect on programme effectiveness and trial completion. Future research should investigate strategies to maximise attendance and engagement in those reporting poorer mental health. Trial registration: The original trial (ISRCTN82857232) and five year follow up (ISRCTN64986150) were prospectively registered with Current Controlled Trials on 15/10/2012 and 01/02/2018.
Keywords
Research, Obesity, Prevention, Weight loss, Mental health, Engagement
Sponsorship
Medical Research Council (Grant MC_UU_00006/6)
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (RP-PG-0216-20010)
National Prevention Research Initiative (MR/J000493)
Identifiers
s12966-021-01216-6, 1216
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01216-6
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/330434
Rights
Licence:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk