StW 573 Australopithecus prometheus: Its Significance for an Australopith Bauplan.
Crompton, Robin Huw
Pickering, Travis Rayne
Carlson, Kristian J
Folia Primatol (Basel)
MetadataShow full item record
Crompton, R. H., McClymont, J., Elton, S., Thorpe, S., Sellers, W., Heaton, J., Pickering, T. R., et al. (2021). StW 573 Australopithecus prometheus: Its Significance for an Australopith Bauplan.. Folia Primatol (Basel) https://doi.org/10.1159/000519723
The StW 573 skeleton of Australopithecus prometheus from Sterkfontein Member 2 is some 93% complete and thus by far the most complete member of that genus yet found. Firmly dated at 3.67 Ma, it is one of the earliest specimens of its genus. A crucial aspect of interpretation of locomotor behaviour from fossil remains is an understanding of the palaeoenvironment in which the individual lived and the manner in which it would have used it. While the value of this ecomorphological approach is largely accepted, it has not been widely used as a stable framework on which to build evolutionary biomechanical interpretations. Here, we collate the available evidence on StW 573's anatomy in order, as far as currently possible, to reconstruct what might have been this individual's realized and potential niche. We explore the concept of a common Australopithecus "bauplan" by comparing the morphology and ecological context of StW 573 to that of paenocontemporaneous australopiths including Australopithecus anamensis and KSD-VP-1/1 Australopithecus afarensis. Each was probably substantially arboreal and woodland-dwelling, relying substantially on arboreal resources. We use a hypothesis-driven approach, tested by: virtual experiments, in the case of extinct species; biomechanical analyses of the locomotor behaviour of living great ape species; and analogical experiments with human subjects. From these, we conclude that the habitual locomotor mode of all australopiths was upright bipedalism, whether on the ground or on branches. Some later australopiths such as Australopithecus sediba undoubtedly became more terrestrial, allowing sacrifice of arboreal stability in favour of manual dexterity. Indeed, modern humans retain arboreal climbing skills but have further sacrificed arboreal effectiveness for enhanced ability to sustain striding terrestrial bipedalism over much greater distances. We compare StW 573's locomotor adaptations to those of living great apes and protohominins, and agree with those earlier observers who suggest that the common panin-hominin last common ancestor was postcranially more like Gorilla than Pan.
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000519723
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/330689
All rights reserved
Licence URL: http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved