Post-COVID-19 WHO Reform: Ethical Considerations.
Public Health Ethics
Oxford University Press (OUP)
MetadataShow full item record
de Campos-Rudinsky, T. C. (2021). Post-COVID-19 WHO Reform: Ethical Considerations.. Public Health Ethics, 14 (2), 134-147. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phab011
Funder: Jordan de Campos-Rudinsky
This study argues against the expansive approach to the WHO reform, according to which to be a better global health leader, WHO should do more, be given more power and financial resources, have more operational capacities, and have more teeth by introducing more coercive monitoring and compliance mechanisms to its IHR. The expansive approach is a political problem, whose root cause lies in ethics: WHO's political overambition is grounded on WHO's lack of conceptual clarity on what good leadership means and what health (as a human right) means. This study presents this ethical analysis by putting forth an alternative: the humble approach to the WHO reform. It argues that to be a better leader, WHO should do much less and have a much narrower mandate. More specifically, WHO should focus exclusively on coordination efforts, by ensuring truthful, evidence-based, consistent, and timely shared communications regarding PHEIC among WHO member-states and other global health stakeholders, if the organization desires to be a real global health leader whose authority the international community respects and whose guidance people trust.
Generic health relevance
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phab011
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/330817
Attribution 4.0 International
Licence URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: firstname.lastname@example.org